The sound roots of Umóⁿhoⁿ

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-0943/16392

Keywords:

onomatopoeias, Siouan languages, ideophones, parts of speech, instrumental affixes

Abstract

This paper presents a corpus-based study of lexemes denoting sounds in Umóⁿhoⁿ (oma), a Siouan language of North America. I take as a starting point a list of sound-denoting verbal roots (in short: “sound roots”), presented as onomatopoeia in a paper by Dorsey in 1892, that form a coherent set based on their semantic features – they denote sounds. I describe their morphological and syntactic features and their form-meaning mappings in order to assess (1) whether these features distinguish them from other verbal roots, and (2) how well they fit the cross-linguistic definition of ideophones proposed by Dingemanse in 2019. I show that several salient morphological and syntactic features are repeatedly attested with sound roots. However, the currently available corpus does not provide evidence that the sound roots form a homogeneous class on the morphological and syntactic level, due to the disparity of features attested from one root to the other. Hence I conclude that these roots cannot be considered ideophones in Dingemanse’s sense. Nonetheless, similarities between the sound roots of Umóⁿhoⁿ and ideophones in other languages can be observed. They can be grammatically integrated, by contrast with onomatopoeia, and their meaning extends from sound to other sensory domains.

References

de Reuse, Willem J. 2022. Consonant symbolism in Western Apache ideophones. (Paper presented at the workshop Consonant and Vowel Symbolism in Native North American languages, Paris, December 8, 2023)

Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10). 654–672.

Dingemanse, Mark. 2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. Language Typology and Universals 70(2). 363–384.

Dingemanse, Mark. 2019. ‘Ideophone’ as a comparative concept. In Akita, Kimi & Pardeshi, Prashant (eds.), Ideophones, mimetics and expressives, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dingemanse, Mark & Akita, Kimi. 2016. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53(3). 501–532.

Dorsey, James Owen. 1890. The Ȼegiha Language, Contributions to North American Ethnology, vol. 6. Washington, D. C.: U.S. government.

Dorsey, James Owen. 1891. Omaha and Ponka letters. Bulletin 11. Washington: Bureau of American Ethnology.

Dorsey, James Owen. 1892. Siouan onomatopes. American Anthropologist 5(1). 1–8.

Dorsey, James Owen. n.d. A grammar and dictionary of the Ponca language by the Reverend J. Owen Dorsey - Formerly missionary under the Indian Commission of the Protestant Episcopal Church. (Manuscript dictionary flashcards)

Duncan, Philip. T. 2022. How Kiksht does a lot with ideophones. (Paper presented at the workshop Typology of Ideophones, online, June 24-25, 2022)

Dwyer, David & Moshi, Lioba. 2003. Primary and grammaticalized ideophones. In Mugane, John M. (ed.), Linguistic typology and representation of African languages, 173–185. Trenton: Africa World Press.

Eschenberg, Ardis. 2005. The article system of Umónhon (Omaha). Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.

Fletcher, Alice & La Flesche, Francis. 1911. The Omaha tribe. Washington: Bureau of American Ethnology.

Guillaume, Antoine. 2009. Les suffixes verbaux de mouvement associé en cavineña. Faits de Langues 34(2). 181–204.

Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Headman, Louis & O’Neil, Sean. 2019. Dictionary of the Ponca People. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jacques, Guillaume. 2023. Periodic tense markers in the world’s languages and their sources. Folia Linguistica 57(3). 539–562. (doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2023-2013)

Johansson, Niklas Erben & Anikin, Andrey & Carling, Gerd & Holmer, Arthur. 2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology 24(2). 253–310.

Körtvélyessy, Lívia. 2020. Onomatopoeia–A unique species? Studia Linguistica. 74(2). 506–551.

Larson, Rory. 2022. RE: Could there be a suffix -é? (Email sent on June 16, 2022 to siouan@listserv.unl.edu)

Marsault, Julie. 2021. Valency-changing operations in Umónhon: affixation, incorporation, and syntactic constructions. Doctoral dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3.

Marsault, Julie. accepted. Consonant gradation in Umóⁿhoⁿ and Páⁿka. Accepted in Anthropological Linguistics

Matthews, G. H. 1970. Some notes on the Proto-Siouan continuants. International Journal of American Linguistics 36(2). 98–109.

McLean, Bonnie. 2021. Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology 25(3). 507–549.

Merrill, John Thomas. 2018. The historical origin of consonant mutation in the Atlantic languages. Doctoral dissertation, University of California Berkeley.

Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mithun, Marianne. 2015. Morphological complexity and language contact in languages indigenous to North America. Linguistic Discovery 13(2). 37–55.

Mithun, Marianne. 2017. Polysynthesis in North America. In Fortescue, Michael & Mithun, Marianne & Evans, Nicholas (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 235–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Munro, Pamela. 1998. Chickasaw expressive “say” constructions. In Hinton, Leanne & Munro, Pamela (eds.), Studies in American Indian languages: Description and theory, 180–86. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Rankin, Robert L. 1974. Observations on Dhegiha (Siouan) phonetics and phonology.  (Paper presented at the XIIIth conference on American Indian Languages, November 22th 1974, Mexico D.F.)

Rankin, Robert L. 2008. James Owen Dorsey’s The Dhegiha language. Unpublished MS.

Rankin, Robert L. & Carter, Richard T. & Jones, A. Wesley & Koontz, John E. & Rood, David S. & Hartmann, Iren. (eds.). 2015. Comparative Siouan Dictionary. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at:  https://csd.clld.org/ (Accessed 2023.11.20)

Sanchez, Emmaline Walker & Larson, Rory & Walker, Arlene. in progress. A phonological dictionary of Omaha, with Emmaline Walker Sanchez. Unpublished MS.

Saunsoci, Alice & Eschenberg, Ardis. 2016. 500+ verbs in Umónhon (Omaha) - doing things in the Umónhon way. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

ULCC. 2018. Part I: Lessons from the Umónhon Language and Culture Center, Umónhon Nation Public School, Macy, Nebraska. Umónhon Íye the, Umónhon Úshkon-the: The Omaha language and the Omaha way. An introduction to Omaha language and culture, 3–242. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

UNL-OLIT. 2018. Part II: Lessons from the Omaha language class at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. In ULCC & OLIT (eds.), Umónhon Íye the, Umónhon Úshkon-the: The Omaha language and the Omaha way. An introduction to Omaha language and culture, 243–636. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Ullmann, Stephen. 1962. Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Wilkins, David P. 1992. Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2–3). 119–158.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-12

How to Cite

1.
Marsault J. The sound roots of Umóⁿhoⁿ. LTC [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];4(1):44-90. Available from: https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/16392