The Dimensions of Morphosyntactic Variation: Whorf, Greenberg and Nichols were right

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-0943/17482

Keywords:

typology, word order, morphosyntax, head/dependent-marking, computational linguistics, areality

Abstract

We examine a database of 3089 languages coded for 351 morphosyntactic features, including almost all of the morphosyntactic features found in The World Atlas of Language Structures (Dryer & Haspelmath 2013). We apply Factor Analysis of Mixed Data, and determine that the main dimensions of global morphological variation involve (1) word order in clauses and adpositional phrases, (2) head- versus dependent-marking, and (3) a set of features that show an east-west distribution. We find roughly the same features clustering in similar dimensions when we examine individual macro-areas, thus confirming the universal relevance of these groupings of features, as encapsulated in well-known implicational universals. This study confirms established insights in linguistic typology, extending earlier research to a much larger set of languages, and uncovers a number of areal patterns in the data.

References

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2009. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van der Auwera, Johan. 2011. Standard Average European. In Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Languages and Linguistics of Europe: A Comprehensive Guide, 291–306. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

Bickel, Balthasar. 2002. The AUTOTYP research program. Invited talk given at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Typology Resource Center Utrecht, September 26–28, 2002.

Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2006. Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the Theory of Linguistic Areas. Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 3–15. Berkeley Linguistics Society and the Linguistic Society of America.

Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2013. Inflectional Synthesis of the Verb. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/22.

Bickel, Balthasar, Johanna Nichols, Taras Zakharko, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Kristine Hildebrandt, Michael Rießler, Lennart Bierkandt, Fernando Zúñiga & John B. Lowe. 2023. The AUTOTYP database (v1.1.1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7976754.

Bowern, Claire. 2006. Another Look at Australia as a Linguistic Area. In Yaron Matras, April McMahon & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Linguistic Areas, 244–265. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, Lea. 2005. Nias. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, 562–589. London: Routledge.

Bugaeva, Anna, Johanna Nichols & Balthasar Bickel. 2021. Appositive possession in Ainu and around the Pacific. Linguistic Typology 26(1). 43–88.

Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press.

Campbell, Lyle, Terrence Kaufman & Thomas Smith-Stark. 1986. Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62(3). 530–558.

Catford, John C. 1977. Mountain of tongues: the languages of the Caucasus. Annual Review of Anthropology 6. 283–314.

Cattell, Raymond B. 1966. The Scree Test for The Number of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1(2). 245–276.

Clauson, Gerard. 1956. The case against the Altaic theory. Central Asiatic Journal 2. 181–187.

Comrie, Bernard. 1988. Linguistic Typology. Annual Review of Anthropology 17. 145–159.

Comrie, Bernard. 2001. Different views of language typology. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol. 1, 24–39. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Constenla Umaña, Adolfo. 1991. Las lenguas del área intermedia: introducción a su estudio areal. San José: Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica.

Crass, Joachim. 2009. Ethiopia. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), A Linguistic Geography of Africa, 228–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crevels, Mily & Hein van der Voort. 2008. The Guaporé-Mamoré region as a linguistic area. In Pieter Muysken (ed.), From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics, 151–179. Studies in Language Companion Series. Vol. 90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Croft, William. 2003. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Daniel, Michael. 2013. Plurality in Independent Personal Pronouns. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/35.

DeLancey, Scott & Victor Golla. 1997. The Penutian hypothesis: Retrospect and prospect. International Journal of American Linguistics 63(1). 171–202

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 2011. Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dixon, R. M. W. 2017. The Australian Linguistic Area. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald  & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 624–650. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Donohue, Mark. 2008. Semantic alignment systems: what’s what, and what’s not. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), Semantic alignment: typological and descriptive studies, 24–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Donohue, Mark & Lea Brown. 1999. Ergativity: some additions from Indonesia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 19(1). 57–76.

Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13. 257–292.

Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations. Language 68(1). 81–138.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Against the six-way order typology, again. Studies in Language 37. 267–301.

Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.) 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info. Accessed on 2023-01-06.

Emeneau, Murray. 1956. India as a Linguistic Area. Language 32 (1). 3–16.

Enfield, Nicholas J. 2005. Areal Linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1). 181–206.

Gabelenz, Georg von der. 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Chr. Herm. Tauchnitz.

Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, 73–113. London: MIT Press.

Güldemann, Tom. 2009. The Macro-Sudan belt: towards identifying a linguistic area in northern sub-Saharan Africa. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), A Linguistic Geography of Africa, 151–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guzmán-Naranjo, Matías & Laura Becker. 2021. Statistical bias control in typology. Linguistic Typology 26(3). 605–670.

Hammarström, Harald & Mark Donohue. 2014. Some principles on Macro-Areas in Typological Comparison. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1). 167–187.

Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2, 1492–1510. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1836. Uber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluß auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Druckerei der Koniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

Janhunen, Juha A. 2023. The Unity and Diversity of Altaic. Annual Review of Linguistics 9(1). 135–154.

Josse, Julie & François Husson. 2016. missMDA: A Package for Handling Missing Values in Multivariate Data Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 70(1). 1–31.

Kari, James & Ben Potter (eds.). 2010. The Dene-Yeniseian connection. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska, New Series 5 (1-2). Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.

Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. Relational Grammar of Kinyarwanda. University of California Publications, Linguistics, 91. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Krupa, Viktor. 1982. Polynesian Languages: a survey of research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Lê, Sébastien, Julie Josse & François Husson. 2008. FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25(1). 1–18.

Macklin-Cordes, Jayden & Erich Round. 2022. Challenges of sampling and how phylogenetic comparative methods help, with a case study of the Pama-Nyungan laminal contrast. Linguistic Typology 26(3). 533–572.

de Menocal, Peter, Joseph Ortiz, Tom Guilderson, Jess Adkins, Michael Sarnthein, Linda Baker & Martha Yarusinsky. 2000. Abrupt onset and termination of the African Humid Period. Quaternary Science Reviews 19(1–5). 347–361.

Merrifield, Judith Thomas. 2010. Yao'an Lolo Grammar Sketch. Dallas: Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics. (MA thesis.)

Michael, Lev, Will Chang & Tammy Stark. 2012. Exploring phonological areality in the circum-Andean region using a Naive Bayes Classifier. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1). 27–86.

Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mithun, Marianne. 2010. Contact and North American Languages. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, 673–694. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Naylor, Paz Buenaventura. 1995. Subject, topic, and Tagalog syntax. In David Benett, Theodora Bynon & George Hewitt (eds.), Subject, Voice and Ergativity, 161–201. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.

Nerbonne, John. 2009. Data-Driven Dialectology. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 175–198.

Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62(1). 56–119.

Nichols, Johanna, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich & Balthasar Bickel. 2013. The autotyp genealogy and geography database: 2013 release. http://www.spw.uzh.ch/autotyp/.

Pagès, Jérôme. 2004. Analyse factorielle de données mixtes. Revue de Statistique Appliquée 4. 93–111.

Pawley, Andrew & Harald Hammarström. 2018. The Trans New Guinea family. In Bill Palmer (ed.), The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area: a Comprehensive Guide, 21–196. The World of Linguistics, Vol. 4. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Plank, Frans. 1998. The co-variation of phonology with morphology and syntax: A hopeful history. Linguistic Typology 2. 195–230.

Polinsky, Maria. 2013. Applicative Constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/109.

Poser, William J. 1995. Binary Comparison and the History of Hokan Comparative Studies. International Journal of American Linguistics 61(1). 135–144.

Ramat, Paolo. 1986. Is a Holistic Typology possible? Folia Linguistica 20 (1-2). 3–14.

Reid, Lawrence A. 2005. The current status of Austric: A review and evaluation of the lexical and morphosyntactic evidence. In Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 134–162. London: Routledge Curzon.

Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1984. The pragmatics of noun incorporation in eastern Cushitic languages. In Frans Plank (ed.), Objects: toward a theory of grammatical relations, 243-268. London: Academic Press.

Schlegel, August Wilhelm von. 1818. Observations sur la langue et la litérature provençales. Paris: Libraire grecque-latine-allemande

Schlegel, Karl Friedrich von. 1808. Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier: Ein Beitrag zur Begründung der Alterthumskunde, nebst metrischen Übersetzungen indischer Gedichte. Heidelberg: Mohr and Zimmer.

Schmidt, Wilhelm. 1906. Die Mon–Khmer-Völker, ein Bindeglied zwischen Völkern Zentralasiens und Austronesiens (‘The Mon–Khmer Peoples, a link between the Peoples of Central Asia and Austronesia’). Archiv für Anthropologie 5. 59–109.

Schönig, Claus. 2003. Turko-Mongolic Relations. In Juha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic Languages, 403–419. London: Routledge.

Skirgård, Hedvig, et al. 2023. Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss. Science Advances 9(16). 1–15. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adg6175

Song, Jae Jung. 2013. Nonperiphrastic Causative Constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/111.

Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1941. The Relation of Habitual Thought and Behavior to Language. In Leslie Spier, A. Irving Hallowell & Stanley S. Newman (eds.), Language, Culture, and Personality: Essays in Memory of Edward Sapir, 75–93. Menasha, Wisconsin: Sapir Memorial Publication Fund. Reprinted in John B. Carroll (ed.) 1956. Language, Thought and Reality. Selected Writings of Benjamins Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-12-27

How to Cite

1.
Kalyan S, Donohue M. The Dimensions of Morphosyntactic Variation: Whorf, Greenberg and Nichols were right. LTC [Internet]. 2023Jan.1 [cited 2024Apr.28];3(2):132-90. Available from: https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/17482

Issue

Section

Research articles