A law of meaning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-0943/18920

Keywords:

semantics, parallel texts, collocation, optimality, negation, personal pronouns, complementizers, knowledge predication

Abstract

This article rejects the canonical ideal of a one-to-one correspondence between meaning and marker and proposes a set-theoretical and optimality-based law for the relationship between meaning and its markers which allows for distinguishing true markers (such as not, no, never for negation) from otherwise associated items (such as negative polarity items as but, any):

a meaning is expressed by the set of non-randomly recurrent markers that together are the best collocation of that meaning.

We implement the law in an algorithm using Dunning’s log-likelihood and illustrate it by extracting markers for ‘know’, negation, first person subject and complementizers from translations of the New Testament in a variety sample of 83 languages with manual evaluation of all extracted markers. Markers are extracted from unannotated texts (with lexemes being just a special case of marker-set coalition phenomena) considering just one meaning at a time (without any need for accounting for specific coexpression types).

References

Aissen, Judith. 1992. Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 68(1). 43–80.  https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0017

Bakker, Dik. 2010. Language sampling. In Jae Sung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beekhuizen, Barend & Maya Blumenthal & Lee Jiang & Anna Pyrtchenkov & Jana Savevska. 2023. Truth be told: a corpus-based study of the cross-linguistic colexification of representational and (inter) subjective meanings. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20(2): 433-459. DOI: 10.1515/cllt-2021-0058 

Blackings, Mairi John. 2000. Ma'di-English and English-Ma'di dictionary. Munich: Lincom.

Blackings, Mairi & Nigel Fabb. 2003. A grammar of Ma’di. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.

Courtz, Henk. 2008. A Carib grammar and dictionary. Toronto: Magoria.

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cysouw, Michael, Chris Biemann & Matthias Ongyerth. 2007. Using Strong’s Numbers in the Bible to test an automatic alignment of parallel texts. STUF Language Typology and Universals 60(2). 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2007.60.2.158

Dahl, Östen. 2007. From questionnaires to parallel corpora in typology. STUF Language Typology and Universals 60(2). 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2007.60.2.172

Dahl, Östen. 2016. Thoughts on language-specific and crosslinguistic entities. Linguistic Typology 20(2): 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0016

Day, Christopher. 1973. The Jacaltec language. Bloomington: Indiana University.

Dewitt, Michael & Sterenly, Kim. 1987. Language & reality. An introduction to the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Diessel, Holger & Michael Tomasello. 2008. The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 97–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.97

Dixon, Robert M. W. 2006. Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In Robert M. W. Dixon, & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation: A cross-linguistic typology, 1-48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13(2). 257–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.2.03dry

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Negative Morphemes. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3). Zenodo.
 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/112)

Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS) Online (v2020.3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 (Available online at https://wals.info)

Dunning, Ted. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19. 61-74.

Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3). 546–592. DOI:10.2307/417135 

Firth, John Rupert. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory 1933-1955. Studies in linguistic analysis, 1-52. Oxford: Philological Society.

François, Alexandre. 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In Vanhove, Martine (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations, 163–216. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Stephane Polis. 2018. The semantic map model: state of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. Language Linguistics Compass 12(2).

Gilliéron, Jules. 1921. Pathologie et thérapeutique verbales. Paris: Champion.

Gilliéron, Jules & Mario Roques. 1912. Études de géographie linguistique: d'après l'Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: Champion.

Goddard, Cliff 2008. Natural Semantic Metalanguage: The state of the art. In Cliff Goddard (ed.), Cross-linguistic semantics, 1-34. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Goddard, Cliff. 2012. Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics 50(3). 711 – 743 https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0022

Goldberg, Adele & Suttle, Laura. 2010. Construction grammar. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(4). 468-477. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.22

Gravelle, Gilles. 2004. Meyah: an east Bird’s Head language of Papua, Indonesia. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. (Doctoral Dissertation).

Hartmann, Iren & Martin Haspelmath & Michael Cysouw. 2014. Identifying semantic role clusters and alignment types via microrole coexpression tendencies. Studies in Language 38(3). 463–484. doi 10.1075/sl.38.3.02har 

Hammarström, Harald & Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2023. Glottolog 4.8. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8131084. (Available online at http://glottolog.org, Accessed on 2023-12-05.)

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language, 86(3), 663-687.

Haspelmath, Martin 2013a. Indefinite Pronouns. In: Dryer, Matthew S. Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3) Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/46)

Haspelmath, Martin. 2013b. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 197–226. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI:10.1515/9783110331127.197

Haspelmath, Martin. 2023. Coexpression and synexpression patterns across languages: Comparative concepts and possible explanations. Frontiers in Psychology 14:1236853. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236853

Haspelmath, Martin & Andrea D. Sims, 2010. Understanding morphology. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.

Holvoet, Axel. 2016. Semantic functions of complementizers in Baltic. In Kasper Boye & Peter Kehayov (eds.), Complementizer semantics in European languages, 225-263. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI:10.1515/9783110416619-009

Horie, Kaoru. 1993. A cross-linguistic study of perception and cognition verb complements: a cognitive perspective, Diss., University of Southern California.

Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories and non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2. 39–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233713 

Kehayov, Peter & Kasper Boye. 2016. Complementizer sematics – an introduction. In Kasper Boye & Peter Kehayov (eds.), Complementizer semantics in European languages, 1-11. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Levinson, Stephen C. 2022. A Grammar of Yélî Dnye. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733853

Liu, Y., Ye, H., Weissweiler, L., Wicke, P., Pei, R., Zangenfeind, R., & Schütze, H. (2023). A crosslingual investigation of conceptualization in 1335 languages. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08475.

Mańczak, Witold. 1966. La nature du supplétivisme. Linguistics 4(28). 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1966.4.28.82

Manning, Christopher D. & Hinrich Schütze. 1999. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. URL: http://nlp.stanford.edu/fsnlp/ 

Mayer, Thomas & Michael Cysouw. 2014. Creating a massively parallel Bible corpus. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Reykjavik, 3158–3163. URL: http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/220_Paper.pdf

McCarthy, John J. 2007. What is optimality theory?. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(4). 260-291. 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00018.x.

Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197631

Miestamo, Matti. 2013. Symmetric and Asymmetric Standard Negation. In Matthew S. Dryer, & Martin Haspelmath, (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/113)

Noonan, Michael. 2007. Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description 2: Complex constructions, 2nd edn. 52‒150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Pawley, Andrew. 1994. Kalam exponents of lexical and semantic primitives. In Cliff Goddard & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Semantic and lexical universals, 387-421 Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.25.19paw

Pawley, Andrew & Ralph Bulmer. 2011. A dictionary of Kalam with ethnographic notes. Canberra: Australian National University. http://doi.org/10.4225/72/56E977731EC84 

Riemer, Nick. 2010. Introducing semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rijkhoff, Jan & Dik Bakker. 1998. Language samplingLinguistic Typology 2(3). 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.3.263

Rosch, Eleanor & Carolyn B. Mervis & Wayne D. Gray & David M. Johnson & Penny Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 8(3). 382–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1967/8. Cours de linguistique générale. Édition critique par Rudolf Engler. 1-3. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 

Sjöberg, Anna. 2023. Knowledge Predication – A Semantic Typology. Ph.D. Stockholm University https://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1800727/FULLTEXT02.pdf

Smyth. 2013. Thai. An essential grammar. London: Routledge.

Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1959. Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Methuen.

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.

van der Auwera, Johan & Ludo Lejeune. 2013. The Prohibitive. In Matthew S. Dryer, & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). WALS Online (v2020.3). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/71).

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 

Verdizade, Allahverdi. 2018. Selected topics in the grammar and lexicon of Matal. Stockholm University MA thesis.

Vries, Lourens de. 2007. Some remarks on the use of Bible translations as parallel texts in linguistic research. Language Typology and Universals, 60(2), 148-157. DOI: 10.1524/stuf.2007.60.2.148

Wälchli, Bernhard. 2014. Algorithmic typology and going from known to similar unknown categories within and across languages. In Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech, 355-393. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110317558.355

Wälchli, Bernhard. 2024. We need world-wide corpus-based typology: A parallel corpus study of restrictives ('only'). Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique 79: 69-157. https://doi.org/10.26034/ne.tranel.2024.4824

Wälchli, Bernhard & Michael Cysouw. 2012. Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics, 50(3), 671-710. DOI 10.1515/ling-2012-0021

Wälchli, Bernhard & Sölling, Arnd. 2013. The encoding of motion events: Building typology bottom-up from text data in many languages. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (eds.), Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events, 77-113. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.41.04w228l

Wible, David & Tsao, Nai-Lung. 2010. StringNet as a Computational Resource for Discovering and Investigating Linguistic Constructions. Proceedings of the NAACL HLT Workshop on Extracting and Using Constructions in Computational Linguistics https://aclanthology.org/W10-0804

Wierzbicka, Anna. 2018. I know: A human universal. In Stephen Stich & Masaharu Mizumoto & Eric McCready (eds.), Epistemology for the rest of the world, 215-250. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190865085.003.0010

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

Xu, Yang & Khang Duong & Barbara C. Malt & Serena Jiang & Mahesh Srinivasan. 2020. Conceptual relations predict colexification across languages. Cognition 201. 104280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104280

Zariquiey Biondi, Roberto. 2011. A grammar of Kashibo-Kakataibo. Melbourne: LaTrobe University. (Doctoral Dissertation).

Downloads

Published

2025-01-23

How to Cite

1.
Wälchli B, Sjöberg A. A law of meaning. LTC [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Jan. 27];4(2):1-71. Available from: https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/18920

Issue

Section

Research articles