Left Detachment in a verb-final language: the interactional perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2785-0943/19445Keywords:
left dislocation, hanging topic, information structure, Trans-Himalayan, Tibeto-BurmanAbstract
The study examines Left Detached (LD) structures (Left Dislocation and Hanging Topics) in a corpus of natural interaction in Anal Naga (Trans-Himalayan, India; ISO 639-3:anm) in the multimodal interactional framework. Instead of following the pre-empirical assumption that LD-structures form a syntactic construction, the study demonstrates that they are instantiations of a broader phenomenon of “detached NPs”. These are NPs which initiate a new syntactic structure and terminate the Intonation Unit. The study argues that such NPs constitute a separate move in interaction which achieves local goals while the continuation is not yet planned, as is evidenced by prosody, gaze, and co-gesture. There are two frequent scenarios where detached NPs occur: (i) turn-taking, where the detached constituent serves as the locus of securing the floor or for a search of a new recipient, and (2) local moves that align the joint attention at a new referent or maintain the attention at an active referent. LD-structures do not form a separate group within these examples with respect to their function, usage, and frequency. As such, they are occasional compositional collocations of a detached NP and a clause. The apparent topical effects associated with LD-structures require no concept of topicality but are vague interpretive effects epiphenomenal of the general factors of attention and relevance and observed only in static retrospective examination. They are unneeded for the analysis and irrelevant for the dynamic planning and processing of interactional discourse.
Downloads
References
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
Auer, Peter. 2000. On Line-Syntax - Oder: Was Es Bedeuten Könnte, Die Zeitlichkeit Der Mündlichen Sprache Ernst Zu Nehmen. Sprache Und Literatur 31 (1). 43–56. https://doi.org/10.30965/25890859-031-01-90000005.
Birner, Betty J. & Gregory L. Ward. 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Duranti, Alessandro & Elinor Ochs. 1979. Left-Dislocation in Italian Conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 12. 377–416.
Endriss, Cornelia. 2009. Quantificational Topics a Scopal Treatment of Exceptional Wide Scope Phenomena. Dordrecht: Springer.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferreira, Fernanda. 2007. Prosody and Performance in Language Production. Language and Cognitive Processes. 1151–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701461293.
Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left-Dislocation in English. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2014. Widening the Lens: What the Manual Modality Reveals about Language, Learning and Cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369 (1651): 20130295. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0295.
Goodwin, Charles. 1980. Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50 (3–4). 272–302.
Gregory, Michelle L. & Laura A. Michaelis. 2001. Topicalization and Left-Dislocation: A Functional Opposition Revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 33 (11). 1665–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00063-1.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2019. Free NPs as Units in Finnish. Studies in Language, 43 (2). 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16064.hel.
Hopper, Paul J. 2011. Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.) Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, 22–44. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction. In Laury Ritva (ed.), Typological Studies in Language, 80. 99–123. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.80.06hop.
Inbar, Maya, Shir Genzer, Anat Perry, Eitan Grossman, & Ayelet N. Landau. 2023. Intonation Units in Spontaneous Speech Evoke a Neural Response. Journal of Neuroscience, 43 (48). 8189–8200. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0235-23.2023.
Iwasaki, Shimako. 2009. Initiating Interactive Turn Spaces in Japanese Conversation: Local Projection and Collaborative Action. Discourse Processes, 46 (2–3). 226–246.
Jacobs, Joachim. 2001. The Dimensions of Topic-Comment. Linguistics, 39 (4). 641–681. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.027.
Kerr, Betsy. 2014. Left Dislocation in French: Information Structure vs. (?) Interactional Linguistics. In Stacey Katz Bourns & Lindsy L. Myers (eds.) Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in Honor of Knud Lambrecht, Pragmatics & Beyond 224, 223–240. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kim, Ilkyu. 2015. Is Korean -(n)Un a Topic Marker? On the Nature of -(n)Un and Its Relation to Information Structure. Lingua, 154. 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.010.
Kuzar, Ron & Hadar Netz. 2010. Empirical Support for the Principle of the Separation of Reference and Role. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (5). 1460–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.003.14
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, Gene H., Galina B. Bolden, Alexa Hepburn, & Jenny Mandelbaum. 2012. Reference Recalibration Repairs: Adjusting the Precision of Formulations for the Task at Hand. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45 (2). 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.674190.
Maslova, Elena & Giuliano Bernini. 2006. Sentence Topic in the Language of Europe and Beyond. In Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz, Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, 67–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1998. Detached NPs in Japanese Conversation: Types and Functions. Text & Talk, 18 (3). 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.417.
Matsumoto, Kazuko. 2003. Intonation Units in Japanese Conversation: Syntactic, Informational and Functional Structures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morita, Emi & Kyu-hyun Kim. 2022. Revisiting Grammatical Particles from an Interactional Perspective: The Case of the so-Called ‘Subject’ and ‘Topic’ Particles as Pragmatic Markers in Japanese and Korean: An Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 188. 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.014.
Netz, Hadar, & Ron Kuzar. 2007. Three Marked Theme Constructions in Spoken English. Focus-on Issue: Discourse, Information, and Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (2). 305–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.007.
O’Madagain, Cathal & Michael Tomasello. 2021. Joint Attention to Mental Content and the Social Origin of Reasoning. Synthese, 198 (5). 4057–4078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02327-1.
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson. 1994. Unattached NPs in English Conversation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20 (1). 402–419. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v20i1.1477.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2018. A Community-Driven Documentation of Natural Discourse in Anal, an Endangered Tibeto-Burman Language. London: ELAR. https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI1035093.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2021a. Multifactorial Information Management: Summing up the Emerging Alternative to Information Structure. Linguistics Vanguard, 7 (1): 2020039.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2021b. Prosodic Salience in Anal Naga: Where Non-Arbitrariness, Phaticity and Engagement Meet. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 6 (1): 41. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.967.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2025. Left Dislocation in Spoken Hebrew: It Is Neither Topicalising, nor a Construction. Linguistics, 63 (4). 907-947. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2023-0174.
Pawley, Andrew & Frances Hodgetts Syder. 2000. The One-Clause-at-a-Time Hypothesis. In Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on Fluency, 163–199. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pekarek-Doehler, Simona, Elwys De Stefani & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher. 2015. Time and Emergence in Grammar: Dislocation, Topicalization and Hanging Topic in French Talk-in-Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Prince, Ellen F. 1998. On the Limits of Syntax, with Reference to Left-Dislocation and Topicalization. In Peter W. Culicover & Louise McNall (eds.), The Limits of Syntax, 29, Syntax and Semantics, 261–302. San Diego: Academic Press.
Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. 2015. Nonhuman Primate Communication, Pragmatics, and the Origins of Language. Current Anthropology, 56 (1). 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/679674.
Shor, Leon. 2019. Third Person Human Reference in Israeli Hebrew Conversation. Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University (Doctoral Dissertation).
Siposova, Barbora & Malinda Carpenter. 2019. A New Look at Joint Attention and Common Knowledge. Cognition, 189. 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.019.
Sornicola, Rosanna. 1981. Sul parlato. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1996. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice. 2012. Prosody, Syntax and Action Formation: Intonation Phrases as ‘Action Components. In Pia Bergmann, Jana Brenning, Martin Pfeiffer & Elisabeth Reber (eds.), Prosody and Embodiment in Interactional Grammar, 142–169. Linguae & Litterae 18. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tanaka, Hiroko. 2015. Action-Projection in Japanese Conversation: Topic Particles Wa, Mo, and Tte for Triggering Categorization Activities. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01113.
Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Gramar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tao, Hongyin. 2020. NP Clustering in Mandarin Conversational Interaction. In Tsuyoshi Ono & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The “Noun Phrase” across Languages: An Emergent Unit in Interaction, 272–314. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Thompson, Sandra A. 2019. Understanding ‘Clause’ as an Emergent ‘Unit’ in Everyday Conversation. Studies in Language, 43 (2). 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16032.tho.
Tomlin, Russell S. 1997. Mapping Conceptual Representations into Linguistic Representations: The Role of Attention in Grammar. In Eric Pederson & Jan Nuyts (eds.), Language and Conceptualization, Language Culture and Cognition, 162–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139086677.007.
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes. 2006. ELAN: A Professional Framework for Multimodality Research. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’06). Genoa, Italy: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2006/pdf/153_pdf.pdf.
Yamaizumi, Minoru. 2011. Left-Dislocation in Japanese and Information Structure Theory. NINJAL Research Papers, 1. 77–92.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pavel Ozerov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
