Are asymmetries in imperative negation based in usage?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-0943/19446Keywords:
asymmetry, Dutch, English, (negative) imperative, usageAbstract
This article extends the study of (a)symmetries in negation to the domain of (negative) imperatives. It examines a balanced sample of the world’s languages for distinctions in tense, direction/location and intersubjectivity and observes that, like with asymmetry in standard negation, they are often neutralized from positive to negative but not vice versa. Intersubjective marking is found to be somewhat exceptional in that the opposite situation does occasionally occur. The article also tests whether and confirms that these asymmetries are grounded in usage patterns, with a corpus investigation of English and Dutch (negative) imperatives. It proposes negation’s discourse presuppositionality, which has been argued to account for neutralization in standard negation, as an explanation for most but not all of these typological and usage-based results in imperative negation too. It nevertheless makes a case for other, more imperative-specific motivations as well.
References
Abdel-Hafiz, Ahmed S. 1988. A reference grammar of Kunuz Nubian. Buffalo: State University of New York. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2014. On future in commands. In Philippe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine & Saghie Sharifzadeh (eds.), Future times, future tenses, 205–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlin, Eithne B. 2004. A grammar of Trio: A Cariban language of Suriname. Frankfurt: Lang.
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2012. Descriptive notions vs. grammatical categories: Unrealized states of affairs and ‘irrealis’. Language Sciences 34(2). 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.001
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2021. Towards a source-oriented approach to typological universals. In Peter Arkadiev, Jurgis Pakerys, Inesa Šeškauskienė & Vaiva Žeimantienė (eds.), Studies in Baltic and other languages: A festschrift for Axel Holvoet on the occasion of his 65th birthday, 97–117. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press.
Davidson, Matthew. 2002. Studies in Southern Wakashan (Nootkan) grammar. Buffalo: University of New York. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
De Clerck, Bernard. 2006. The imperative in English: A corpus-based pragmatic analysis. Ghent: Ghent University. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
de Sousa, Hilário. 2006. The Menggwa Dla language of New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
Devos, Maud & Daniel Van Olmen. 2013. Describing and explaining the variation of Bantu imperatives and prohibitives. Studies in Language 37(1). 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.1.01dev
Donohue, Mark. 1999. A grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13(2). 257–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.2.03dry
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1). 81–138. https://doi.org/10.2307/416370
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Genealogical language list. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/languoid/genealogy (Accessed 2023.03.29)
Enrico, John. 2003. Haida syntax: Volume 1. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Evans, Nicholas D. 1995. A grammar of Kayardild: With historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fleck, David W. 2003. A grammar of Matses. Houston: Rice University. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.
Fortuin, Egbert. 2004. De syntaxis van imperatiefsubjecten en modale partikels: Een pragma-semantische benadering. Nederlandse Taalkunde 9(4). 355–375.
Gossner, Jan D. 1994. Aspects of Edolo grammar. Arlington: University of Texas. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.001
Haspelmath, Martin. 2021. Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics 57(3). 605–633. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000535
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2010. Adjunct adverbials in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2011. A grammar of Kurtöp. Eugene: University of Oregon. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
Jakubícek, Miloš, Adam Kilgarriff, Vojtech Kovár, Pavel Rychlý & Vit Suchomel. 2013. The TenTen corpus family. Proceedings of the International Corpus Linguistics Conference 7. 125–127.
Jary, Mark & Mikhail Kissine. 2016. When terminology matters: The imperative as a comparative concept. Linguistics 54(1). 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0039
Jung, Ingrid. 2008. Gramática del páez o nasa yuwe: Descripción de una lengua indígena de Colombia. Munich: Lincom.
Kimball, Geoffrey D. 1991. Koasati grammar. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Kimps, Ditte & Kristin Davidse. 2008. Illocutionary force and conduciveness in imperative constant polarity tag questions: A typology. Text & Talk 28(6). 699–722. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.036
Kirsner, Robert S. 2003. On the interaction of the Dutch pragmatic particles hoor and hè with the imperative and the imperativus pro imperative. In Arie Verhagen & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), Usage-based approaches to Dutch, 59–96. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 5–38.
Maslova, Elena. 2003. A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2011. How directive constructions emerge: Grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14). 3489–3521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.001
Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Miestamo, Matti. 2007. Symmetric and asymmetric encoding of functional domains, with remarks on typological markedness. In Matti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New challenges in typology: Broadening the horizons and redefining the foundations, 293–314. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Miestamo, Matti & Johan van der Auwera. 2007. Negative declaratives and negative imperatives: Similarities and differences. In Andreas Ammann (ed.), Linguistics festival: May 2006, Bremen, 59–77. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Miestamo, Matti, Dik Bakker & Antti Arppe. 2016. Sampling for variety. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 233–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0006
Miestamo, Matti, Ksenia Shagal & Olli O. Silvennoinen. 2022. Typology and usage: The case of negation. Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads 2(1). 121–154. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-0943/13508
Miestamo, Matti, Olli O. Silvennoinen & Chingduang Yurayong. 2024. Asymmetry in temporal specification between affirmation and negation: Adverbials and tense-aspect neutralization. Studies in Language. aop https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23036.mie
Morris, Henry F. & Brian E.R. Kirwan. 1972. A Runyankore grammar. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.
Mourigh, Khalid. 2015. A grammar of Ghomara Berber. Leiden: Leiden University. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
Nederlandse Taalunie. 2004. Corpus gesproken Nederlands. Release 1.0. The Hague.
Nicolle, Steve. 2009. Go-and-V, come-and-V, go-V and come-V: A corpus-based account of deictic movement verb constructions. English Text Construction 2(2). 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.2.2.03nic
Overall, Simon E. 2017. Commands and prohibitions in Aguaruna. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Commands: A cross-linguistic typology, 61–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Patte, Marie-France. 2008. Parlons Arawak: Une langue amérindienne d'Amazonie. Paris: L'Harmattan.
Pensalfini, Robert. 2003. A grammar of Jingulu, an Aboriginal language of the Northern Territory. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Rice, Keren. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Rupp, James E. 1989. Lealao Chinantec syntax. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Sarvasy, Hannah S. 2017. Imperatives and commands in Nungon. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Commands: A cross-linguistic typology, 224–249. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steeman, Sander. 2011. A grammar of Sandawe: A Khoisan language of Tanzania. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Stevenson, Roland, C. 1969. Bagirmi grammar. Khartoum: University of Khartoum.
Survey of English Usage. 2006. International corpus of English: The British component. Release 2. London.
Telban, Borut. 2017. Commands as a form of intimacy among the Karawari of Papua New Guinea. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Commands: A cross-linguistic typology, 266–282. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van der Auwera, Johan. 2005. Imperatives. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 565–567. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
van der Auwera, Johan & Maud Devos. 2012. Irrealis in positive imperatives and in prohibitives. Language Sciences 34(2). 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.003
van der Auwera, Johan & Ludo Lejeune. 2013. The prohibitive. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/71. (Accessed 2023.03.27).
Van der Voort, Hein. 2004. A grammar of Kwaza. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Van Olmen, Daniel. 2010. Typology meets usage: The case of the prohibitive infinitive in Dutch. Folia Linguistica 44(2). 471–508. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2010.017
Van Olmen, Daniel. 2011. The imperative in English and Dutch: A functional analysis in comparable and parallel corpora. Antwerp: University of Antwerp. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
Van Olmen, Daniel. 2019. A three-fold approach to the imperative’s usage in English and Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 139. 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.006
Van Olmen, Daniel. 2021. On order and prohibition. Studies in Language 45(3). 520–556. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19036.van
Van Olmen, Daniel. 2024. Specialization and finiteness (a)symmetry in imperative negation: With a comparison to standard negation. Linguistic Typology 28(2). 205-252. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2022-0007
Van Olmen, Daniel, Maud Devos & Valentin Rădulescu. 2023. (A)symmetries in imperative negation in Eastern Bantu. Africana Linguistica 29. 179–222.
Vismans, Roel. 1994. Modal particles in Dutch directives: A study in functional grammar. Dordrecht: ICG Printing.
Vuillermet, Marine. 2012. A grammar of Ese Ejja, a Tokanan language of the Bolivian Amazon. Lyon: Lumière University of Lyon 2. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
West, Birdie. 1980. Gramatica popular del Tucano. Bogotá: Linguistics Institute of Verano.
Wichmann, Anne. 2004. The intonation of please-requests: A corpus-based study. Journal of Pragmatics 36(9). 1521–1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.003
Wilbur, Joshua. 2014. A grammar of Pite Saami. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Xrakovskij, Viktor S. (ed.). 2001. Typology of imperative constructions. Munich: Lincom.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Van Olmen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
