Governor-driven subjunctive selection: a variationist study from Latin to Romance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2785-0943/19726Keywords:
subjunctive mood, variationist sociolinguistics, lexicalisation, Romance languages, Vulgar Latin, completive clausesAbstract
A key parameter to measure (dis)continuity between Romance languages and the ancestor language, Latin, is mood selection, especially the use of the subjunctive as opposed to the indicative according to syntactic environments and semantic meanings supposedly conveyed. This study explores the trajectory of mood selection in that-completive clauses from Latin to modern Romance languages, with a particular focus on Italian. It challenges the assumption that subjunctive selection is semantically motivated, highlighting recent variationist findings that identify the main clause verb’s lexical identity as the subjunctive’s major predictor. By employing a variationist sociolinguistic approach, this research delineates the evolution of subjunctive selection, revealing that contemporary patterns in Romance languages may reflect a continuation of lexicalization processes initiated in Vulgar Latin, rather than a recent desemanticization phenomenon. This analysis contributes a nuanced understanding of subjunctive selection, offering new perspectives on its function and evolution across Romance languages.
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 1996. The Logical Form of Negative Concord. Working Papers in Linguistics, 1–29. Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia.
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy. 2000. Voices from the past. Sources of Seventeenth-Century Spoken French. Romanische Forschungen, 112(3). 323–348.
Berlinck, Rosane. 2019. Subjuntivo vs indicativo em orações completivas: percurso diacrônico no português brasileiro. In Ernestina Carrilho, Ana Maria Martins, Sandra Pereira & João Paulo Silvestre (eds.), Estudos linguísticos e filológicos oferecidos a Ivo Castro, 217–245. 1st ed. Lisboa: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa.
Binazzi, Neri. 2015. La frequente rinuncia al "che" nel parlato fiorentino: caratteristiche del fenomeno e spunti di riflessione per la lingua comune. Studi di grammatica italiana, vol. 33, 255–294. Le Lettere. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
Bodelot, Colette. 2003. Grammaire fondamentale du latin: Les propositions complétives en latin. Tome X (Bibliothèque d’études Classiques). Louvain: Peeters.
Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1989. Parameters in the expression of embedded predications in Latin. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Subordination and other Topics in Latin: Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1-5 April 1985, 3–36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Bonomi, Ilaria. 1993. I giornali e l'italiano dell'uso medio. Studi di grammatica italiana, 15. 181-201.
Bybee, Joan L. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 602–623. London: Blackwell.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, Lyle. 2013. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Cambridge/Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Carlier, Anne, Walter De Mulder & Béatrice Lamiroy. 2012. Introduction: The pace of grammaticalization in a typological perspective. Folia Linguistica, 46(2). 287–302. (doi:10.1515/flin.2012.010)
Chinellato, Paolo. 2001. L’interpretazione morfosemantica del modo congiuntivo in italiano e in tedesco. Rivista di grammatica generativa 26. 3–20.
Clackson, James. 2011. A Companion to the Latin Language. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Costantini, Francesco. 2011. Subjunctive obviation in nonargument clauses. Working Papers in Linguistics, 39–61. Università Ca’Foscari di Venezia.
Cressot, Marcel. 1947. Le style et ses techniques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia. 2005. C-ORAL-ROM integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. (http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=622285) (Accessed May 30, 2016.)
De Mauro, Tullio, Federico Mancini, Massimo Vedovelli & Miriam Voghera. 1993. Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milano: Etas.
Digesto, Salvio. 2019. Verum a fontibus haurire. A Variationist Analysis of Subjunctive Variability Across Space and Time: from Contemporary Italian back to Latin. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa.
Digesto, Salvio. 2021. Lexicalization and Social Meaning of the Italian Subjunctive. Cadernos de Linguística, 2(3). e609. (doi:10.25189/2675-4916.2021.V2.N3.ID609)
Disterheft, Dorothy & Carlotta Viti. 2010. Subordination. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), Continuum companion to historical linguistics (Bloomsbury Companions), 230–249. London: Continuum.
Dorigo, Carlo Alberto. 1951. Problemi di metodo e prospettive nuove negli studi della sintassi italiana. Aevum. Rassegna di scienze storiche, linguistiche e filologiche, XXV(4). 355–361.
Durante, Marcello. 1981. Dal latino all’italiano moderno: saggio di storia linguistica e culturale. Bologna: Zanichelli.
Elsig, Martin & Shana Poplack. 2006. Transplanted dialects and language change: question formation in Québec. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 12(2), Selected Papers from NWAV 34. 77–90.
Farkas, Donka F. 1992. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In Paul Hirschbühler & Ernst Friedrich K. Koerner (Eds.), Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, vol. 91), 69–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gatta, Francesca. 2002. Osservazioni sul congiuntivo in margine ad una giornata televisiva. In Leo Schena, Michele Prandi & Marco Mazzoleni (eds.), Intorno al congiuntivo, Atti del Convegno Nazionale “Attorno al congiuntivo. Storia, tipologia, traduzione” (Forlì, 2 – 3 marzo 2000), 83–92. CLUEB. Bologna: CLUEB.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1995. Subjunctive, habituality and negative polarity. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 5. 132–150.
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Alda Mari. 2015. Mixed (Non)Veridicality and Mood Choice in Complement Clauses. CLS 51. Chicago, France.
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi. 1997. Tense and Aspect: from Semantics to Morphosyntax (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). New York: Oxford University Press.
Givón, Talmy. 2018. Negation in language: Between semantics and pragmatics. On Understanding Grammar: Revised Edition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gorman, Kyle & Daniel Ezra Johnson. 2013. 214 Quantitative Analysis. In Robert Bayley, Richard Cameron, & Ceil Lucas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 214–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guy, Gregory R. 1988. Advanced VARBRUL analysis. In Kathleen Ferrara, Becky Brown, Keith Walters & John Baugh (eds.), Linguistic Contact and Change: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, 124–136. Austin, TX: University of Texas Department of Linguistics.
Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspective on Grammaticalization, 3–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Handford, Stanley A. 1947. The Latin Subjunctive. Its Usage And Development From Plautus To Tacitus. London: Methuen.
Harris, Martin. 1974. The subjunctive mood as a changing category in Romance. In John M. Anderson & Charles Jones (eds.), Historical Linguistics II, 169–188. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Harris, Martin. 1978. The evolution of French syntax: a comparative approach (Longman Linguistics Library 22). London/New York: Longman.
Harris, Martin & Nigel Vincent. 1997. The Romance Languages. London: Routledge.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 211–242. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Haudry, Jean. 1973. Parataxe, hypotaxe et correlation dans la phrase latine. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 68. 147–186.
Herman, József. 1989. Accusativus cum Infinitivo et subordonnée à quod, quia en latin tardif: Nouvelles remarques sur un vieux problème. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Subordination and Other Topics in Latin: Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1-5 April 1985, 133–152. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hooper, Joan. 1975. On assertive predicates. In John Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 4, 91–124. New York: Academic Press.
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
Kastronic, Laura. 2016. A Comparative Variationist Approach to Morphosyntactic Variation in Contemporary Hexagonal and Quebec French. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa.
Keil, Heinrich. 1857. Flavii Sospatri Charisii Artis grammaticae libri v. Diomedis Artis grammaticae libri III. Ex Charisii Arte grammatica excerpta. Lipsia: In aedibvs B.G. Teubneri.
Klein, Flora. 1975. Pragmatic constraints on distribution: the Spanish subjunctive. Papers from the regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society XI. 353–365.
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Internal Factors. Language in Society. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William. 1984. Field Methods of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation. In John Baugh & Joel Sherzer (eds.), Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics, 28–54. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pretence-Hall. (Accessed July 17, 2017.)
Labov, William. 1989. The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change, 1(1). 85–97.
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Social Factors. Language in Society. Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. 2nd revised. Munich: Lincom.
Leone, Alfonso. 1949. L’uso del congiuntivo in Latino. Principi di sintassi ragionata. Catania: tip. Coniglione & Giuffrida.
Lindschouw, Jan. 2011. Étude des modes dans le système concessif en français du 16e au 20e siècle et en espagnol moderne : évolution, assertion et grammaticalisation. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Loengarov, Alexander. 2006. L’alternance indicatif/subjonctif dans les langues romanes. Motivation sémantico-pragmatique et grammaticalisation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven (KUL).
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 2003. Pragmaticizzazione dell’incompletezza sintattica nell’italiano parlato: le ipotetiche sospese. In Il parlato italiano.
Magni, Elisabetta. 2009. Mood and Modality. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrases, Adverbs, Mood, Tense, Vol. 2, 193–275. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Maiden, Martin & Cecilia Robustelli. 2007. A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian (Routledge Reference Grammars). 2nd edn. London/New York: Routledge.
Manzini, Maria Rita. 2000. Sentential Complementation: The subjunctive. In Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical Specification and Insertion, 241–267. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Mellet, Sylvie. 1994. Le subjonctif. In Sylvie Mellet, Marie-Dominique Joffre & Guy Serbat (eds.), Grammaire fondamentale du latin. Le signifié du verbe, 173–209. Louvain: Peeters.
Murphy, Melissa Dae. 2008. The role of typological drift in the development of the Romance subjunctive: a study in word-order change, grammaticalization and synthesis. Doctoral dissertation: The University of Texas, Austin.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2017. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
Noonan, Michael. 2007. Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2, 52–150. Complex Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, Leonard R. 1988. The Latin Language (The Great Languages). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge University Press.
Perotti, Pier Angelo. 1996. Sulle interrogative indirette in latino. Latomus: revue d’études latines, 55(3–4). 329–338.
Pinkster, Harm. 1990. Latin syntax and semantics. London: Routledge.
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from the Northern Italian Dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.
Poplack, Shana. 1989. The care and handling of a mega-corpus: The Ottawa-Hull French project. In Ralph W. Fasold & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Language Change and Variation (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 52), 411–451. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Poplack, Shana. 1990. Prescription, intuition et usage: Le Subjonctif français et la variabilité inhérente. Langage et Societe, 54. 5–33. (doi:10.3406/lsoc.1990.2499)
Poplack, Shana. 1992. The inherent variability of the French subjunctive. In Christiane Laeufer & Terrell A. Morgan (eds.), Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics: selected papers from the nineteenth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XIX), The Ohio State University, April 21-23, 1989, 235–263. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Poplack, Shana. 2011. Grammaticalization and linguistic Variation. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 209–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poplack, Shana, Allison Lealess & Nathalie Dion. 2013. The evolving grammar of the French subjunctive. International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics, 25(1). 139–195. (doi:10.1515/probus-2013-0005)
Poplack, Shana & Stephen Levey. 2010. Contact-induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. In Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language and Space - An international handbook of linguistic variation, Vol. 1: Theories and methods, 391–419. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Poplack, Shana & Sali A Tagliamonte. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Poplack, Shana, Rena Torres Cacoullos, Nathalie Dion, Rosane e Andrade Berlinck, Salvio Digesto, Dora Lacasse & Jonathan Steuck. 2018. Variation and grammaticalization in Romance: A cross-linguistic study of the subjunctive. In Wendy Ayres-Bennett & Janice Carruthers (eds.), Manuals in Linguistics: Romance Sociolinguistics, 217-252. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Portner, Paul. 1998. The semantics of mood. GLOT International, 4(1). 3-8
Portner, Paul & Aynat Rubinstein. 2013. Mood and contextual commitment. In Proceedings of SALT, 22. 461–487. CLC Publications.
Quer, Josep. 2001. Interpreting mood. Probus. Walter de Gruyter, 13(1). 81–111. (doi:10.1515/prbs.13.1.81)
Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical linguistics: its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Santulli, Francesca. 2009. Il congiuntivo italiano: morte o rinascita? In Rivista Italiana di Linguistica e di Dialettologia. 167–195.
Scarsi, Mariangela. 1996. Satyricon / Petronius (Classici Giunti). Firenze: Giunti.
Schachter, Paul & Timothy Shopen. 2007. Parts-of-speech systems. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 1: Clause Structure, 1–60. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (doi:10.1017/CBO9780511619427.001)
Schmitt Jensen, Jørgen. 1970. Subjonctif et hypotaxe en italien: une esquisse de la syntaxe du subjonctif dans les propositions subordonnées en italien contemporain. Odense: Odense University Press.
Schneider, Stefan. 1999. Il congiuntivo tra modalità e subordinazione: uno studio sull’italiano parlato. Roma: Carocci.
Shlonsky, Ur. 2006. Projection étendue et cartographie de SC. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française, (27). 83–93.
Simone, Raffaele. 1993. Stabilità e instabilità nei caratteri originali dell’italiano. In Alberto Sobrero & Paola Benincà & Gaetano Berruto (eds.), Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo. Vol. I: Le strutture. 41–100. Roma - Bari: Laterza.
Soliman, Luciana T. 2002. Modalità e implicazioni aspettuali: analisi contrastiva italiano/francese del congiuntivo nell’ottica psicomeccanica. In Atti del Convegno Attorno al congiuntivo. Storia, tipologia, traduzione. 291–306.
Stefanelli, Stefania. 2006. Va in scena l’italiano: la lingua del teatro tra Ottocento e Novecento. Firenze: Cesati.
Terrell, Tracy & Joan Hooper. 1974. A semantically based analysis of mood in Spanish. Hispania, 57. 484–494.
Thompson, Sandra A. 1998. A discourse explanation for the cross-linguistic differences in the grammar of incorporation and negation. In Anna Siewierska & Ja Jung Song (eds.), Case, Typology and Grammar. Vol. 38, 309–342. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Veland, Reidar. 1991. L’influence modale des verbes d’opinion en italien contemporain: Étude d’un corpus. Studia Neophilologica: A Journal of Germanic and Romance Languages and Literature, 63(2). 209–220.
Voghera, Miriam. 1993. La grammatica del LIP. In Tullio De Mauro, Federico Mancini, Massimo Vedovelli & Miriam Voghera (eds.), Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato, 86–111. Milano: Etas.
Voghera, Miriam. 2001. Teorie linguistiche e dati di parlato. In Francesco Albano Leoni, Lucia Cresti & Giorgio Fiorentino (eds), Dati empirici e teorie linguistiche, 75-95. Roma: Bulzoni.
Wandruszka, Ulrich. 1998. Frasi subordinate al congiuntivo. In Lorenzo Renzi & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. II, 415–481. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Whaley, Lindsay. 1997. Introduction to Typology: The Unity and Diversity of Language. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. (doi:10.4135/9781452233437)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salvio Digesto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
