Governor-driven subjunctive selection: a variationist study from Latin to Romance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2785-0943/19726Keywords:
subjunctive mood, variationist sociolinguistics, lexicalisation, Romance languages, Vulgar Latin, completive clausesAbstract
A key parameter to measure (dis)continuity between Romance languages and the ancestor language, Latin, is mood selection, especially the use of the subjunctive as opposed to the indicative according to syntactic environments and semantic meanings supposedly conveyed. This study explores the trajectory of mood selection in that-completive clauses from Latin to modern Romance languages, with a particular focus on Italian. It challenges the assumption that subjunctive selection is semantically motivated, highlighting recent variationist findings that identify the main clause verb’s lexical identity as the subjunctive’s major predictor. By employing a variationist sociolinguistic approach, this research delineates the evolution of subjunctive selection, revealing that contemporary patterns in Romance languages may reflect a continuation of lexicalization processes initiated in Vulgar Latin, rather than a recent desemanticization phenomenon. This analysis contributes a nuanced understanding of subjunctive selection, offering new perspectives on its function and evolution across Romance languages.
Downloads
References
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
Auer, Peter. 2000. On Line-Syntax - Oder: Was Es Bedeuten Könnte, Die Zeitlichkeit Der Mündlichen Sprache Ernst Zu Nehmen. Sprache Und Literatur 31 (1). 43–56. https://doi.org/10.30965/25890859-031-01-90000005.
Birner, Betty J. & Gregory L. Ward. 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Duranti, Alessandro & Elinor Ochs. 1979. Left-Dislocation in Italian Conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 12. 377–416.
Endriss, Cornelia. 2009. Quantificational Topics a Scopal Treatment of Exceptional Wide Scope Phenomena. Dordrecht: Springer.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferreira, Fernanda. 2007. Prosody and Performance in Language Production. Language and Cognitive Processes. 1151–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701461293.
Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left-Dislocation in English. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2014. Widening the Lens: What the Manual Modality Reveals about Language, Learning and Cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369 (1651): 20130295. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0295.
Goodwin, Charles. 1980. Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50 (3–4). 272–302.
Gregory, Michelle L. & Laura A. Michaelis. 2001. Topicalization and Left-Dislocation: A Functional Opposition Revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 33 (11). 1665–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00063-1.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2019. Free NPs as Units in Finnish. Studies in Language, 43 (2). 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16064.hel.
Hopper, Paul J. 2011. Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.) Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, 22–44. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction. In Laury Ritva (ed.), Typological Studies in Language, 80. 99–123. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.80.06hop.
Inbar, Maya, Shir Genzer, Anat Perry, Eitan Grossman, & Ayelet N. Landau. 2023. Intonation Units in Spontaneous Speech Evoke a Neural Response. Journal of Neuroscience, 43 (48). 8189–8200. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0235-23.2023.
Iwasaki, Shimako. 2009. Initiating Interactive Turn Spaces in Japanese Conversation: Local Projection and Collaborative Action. Discourse Processes, 46 (2–3). 226–246.
Jacobs, Joachim. 2001. The Dimensions of Topic-Comment. Linguistics, 39 (4). 641–681. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.027.
Kerr, Betsy. 2014. Left Dislocation in French: Information Structure vs. (?) Interactional Linguistics. In Stacey Katz Bourns & Lindsy L. Myers (eds.) Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in Honor of Knud Lambrecht, Pragmatics & Beyond 224, 223–240. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kim, Ilkyu. 2015. Is Korean -(n)Un a Topic Marker? On the Nature of -(n)Un and Its Relation to Information Structure. Lingua, 154. 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.010.
Kuzar, Ron & Hadar Netz. 2010. Empirical Support for the Principle of the Separation of Reference and Role. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (5). 1460–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.003.14
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, Gene H., Galina B. Bolden, Alexa Hepburn, & Jenny Mandelbaum. 2012. Reference Recalibration Repairs: Adjusting the Precision of Formulations for the Task at Hand. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45 (2). 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.674190.
Maslova, Elena & Giuliano Bernini. 2006. Sentence Topic in the Language of Europe and Beyond. In Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz, Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, 67–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1998. Detached NPs in Japanese Conversation: Types and Functions. Text & Talk, 18 (3). 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.417.
Matsumoto, Kazuko. 2003. Intonation Units in Japanese Conversation: Syntactic, Informational and Functional Structures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morita, Emi & Kyu-hyun Kim. 2022. Revisiting Grammatical Particles from an Interactional Perspective: The Case of the so-Called ‘Subject’ and ‘Topic’ Particles as Pragmatic Markers in Japanese and Korean: An Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 188. 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.014.
Netz, Hadar, & Ron Kuzar. 2007. Three Marked Theme Constructions in Spoken English. Focus-on Issue: Discourse, Information, and Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (2). 305–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.007.
O’Madagain, Cathal & Michael Tomasello. 2021. Joint Attention to Mental Content and the Social Origin of Reasoning. Synthese, 198 (5). 4057–4078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02327-1.
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson. 1994. Unattached NPs in English Conversation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20 (1). 402–419. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v20i1.1477.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2018. A Community-Driven Documentation of Natural Discourse in Anal, an Endangered Tibeto-Burman Language. London: ELAR. https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI1035093.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2021a. Multifactorial Information Management: Summing up the Emerging Alternative to Information Structure. Linguistics Vanguard, 7 (1): 2020039.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2021b. Prosodic Salience in Anal Naga: Where Non-Arbitrariness, Phaticity and Engagement Meet. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 6 (1): 41. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.967.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2025. Left Dislocation in Spoken Hebrew: It Is Neither Topicalising, nor a Construction. Linguistics, 63 (4). 907-947. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2023-0174.
Pawley, Andrew & Frances Hodgetts Syder. 2000. The One-Clause-at-a-Time Hypothesis. In Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on Fluency, 163–199. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pekarek-Doehler, Simona, Elwys De Stefani & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher. 2015. Time and Emergence in Grammar: Dislocation, Topicalization and Hanging Topic in French Talk-in-Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Prince, Ellen F. 1998. On the Limits of Syntax, with Reference to Left-Dislocation and Topicalization. In Peter W. Culicover & Louise McNall (eds.), The Limits of Syntax, 29, Syntax and Semantics, 261–302. San Diego: Academic Press.
Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. 2015. Nonhuman Primate Communication, Pragmatics, and the Origins of Language. Current Anthropology, 56 (1). 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/679674.
Shor, Leon. 2019. Third Person Human Reference in Israeli Hebrew Conversation. Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University (Doctoral Dissertation).
Siposova, Barbora & Malinda Carpenter. 2019. A New Look at Joint Attention and Common Knowledge. Cognition, 189. 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.019.
Sornicola, Rosanna. 1981. Sul parlato. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1996. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice. 2012. Prosody, Syntax and Action Formation: Intonation Phrases as ‘Action Components. In Pia Bergmann, Jana Brenning, Martin Pfeiffer & Elisabeth Reber (eds.), Prosody and Embodiment in Interactional Grammar, 142–169. Linguae & Litterae 18. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tanaka, Hiroko. 2015. Action-Projection in Japanese Conversation: Topic Particles Wa, Mo, and Tte for Triggering Categorization Activities. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01113.
Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Gramar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tao, Hongyin. 2020. NP Clustering in Mandarin Conversational Interaction. In Tsuyoshi Ono & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The “Noun Phrase” across Languages: An Emergent Unit in Interaction, 272–314. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Thompson, Sandra A. 2019. Understanding ‘Clause’ as an Emergent ‘Unit’ in Everyday Conversation. Studies in Language, 43 (2). 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16032.tho.
Tomlin, Russell S. 1997. Mapping Conceptual Representations into Linguistic Representations: The Role of Attention in Grammar. In Eric Pederson & Jan Nuyts (eds.), Language and Conceptualization, Language Culture and Cognition, 162–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139086677.007.
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes. 2006. ELAN: A Professional Framework for Multimodality Research. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’06). Genoa, Italy: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2006/pdf/153_pdf.pdf.
Yamaizumi, Minoru. 2011. Left-Dislocation in Japanese and Information Structure Theory. NINJAL Research Papers, 1. 77–92.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salvio Digesto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
