Topicality and the problem of “topic” in American Sign Language discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2785-0943/21824Keywords:
identifiability, intersubjectivity, reference point, topic marking, topic shift, topicality, hierarchyAbstract
American Sign Language (ASL) has been characterized as a topic-comment or as a topic-prominent language. But studies based on actual usage reveal a great deal of variation, leading to the proposal here that the very idea of a definable category of topic should be re-examined.
Janzen (2007) proposes a topicality hierarchy for constructions in ASL, finding that the higher degree of topicality an expression has, the less likely it would be found as a marked topic. Only expressions at the lowest levels of the topicality scale occur as marked topics in topic-comment constructions. When the topic content is nominal, marked topic phrases are typically explicit noun phrases or full clauses. Relatedly, marked topics indicate topic shift rather than topic maintenance.
In line with Langacker’s (2008, 2013) analysis of topic expressions as reference-point constructions, topics in ASL are subjectively chosen by signers as a pragmatic framing mechanism, given that the signer might have multiple viable reference points from which to choose. It is also an intersubjective choice, taking into account assumptions regarding the addressee’s knowledge store. If “topic” is a language-specific notion, characterizing topic as a cross-linguistic category may be problematic. It is within this context that “topic” is explored in this study of ASL.
Downloads
References
Aarons, Debra & Bahan, Benjamin & Kegl, Judy & Neidle, Carol. 1992. Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15. 103–142.
Aarons, Debra & Bahan, Benjamin & Kegl, Judy & Neidle, Carol. 1994. Subjects and agreement in American Sign Language. In Algren, Inger & Brita Bergman & Mary Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Vol. 1, 13–28. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Aarons, Debra & Bahan, Benjamin & Kegl, Judy & Neidle, Carol. 1995. Lexical tense markers in American Sign Language. In Emmorey, Karen & Reilly, Judy S. (eds.), Language, Gesture, and Space, 225–253. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Anible, Benjamin & Occhino-Kehoe, Corrine. 2015. What’s happening with HAPPEN? The Grammaticalization of HAPPEN in American Sign Language. In Anible, Benjamin & Beers, Keiko & Hirrel, Laura & Deborah Wager (eds.), Proceedings of the High Desert Linguistics Society Conference 10, 27–41. University of New Mexico.
Baker, Charlotte & Cokely, Denis. 1980. American Sign Language: A Teacher’s Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers.
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1983. A microanalysis of the nonmanual components of questions in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Battison, Robbin. 1978. Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and Topic, 26–55. New York: Academic Press.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1995. Topic, focus and other word order problems in Algonquian. The Belcourt Lecture, 25 February 1994. Winnipeg, Canada: Voices of Rupert’s Land.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language: The Semantics and Morpho-syntax of the Use of Space in a Visual Language. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2010. Factors that form classifier signs. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign Languages, 252–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, Lynn A. 1976. The manifestation of subject, object, and topic in the American Sign Language. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and Topic, 125–148. New York: Academic Press.
Geluykens, Ronald. 1993. Topic introduction in English conversation. Transactions of the Philological Society 91(2). 181–214.
Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. 1985. Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Haiman, John (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24-6, 1983, 187–219. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54. 564–589.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3. 199–244.
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.
Herring, Susan C. 1991. The grammaticalization of rhetorical questions in Tamil. In Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1, 253–284. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hornby, Peter A. 1971. Surface structure and the topic-comment distinction: A developmental study. Child Development 42(6). 1975–1988.
Ingram, Robert M. 1978. Theme, rheme, topic, and comment in the syntax of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 20. 193–218.
Isenhath, John O. 1990. The Linguistics of American Sign Language. Jefferson, NC: MacFarland & Company.
Janzen, Terry. 1995a. Differentiating topic from subject in ASL. In Aubin, Marie-Christine (ed.), Perspectives d'avenir en traduction, 57–74. Winnipeg: Presses universitaires de Saint-Boniface.
Janzen, Terry. 1995b. The Polygrammaticalization of FINISH in ASL. Master's Dissertation, University of Manitoba.
Janzen, Terry. 1998. Topicality in ASL: Information Ordering, Constituent Structure, and the Function of Topic Marking. Doctoral Dissertation, University of New Mexico.
Janzen, Terry. 1999. The grammaticization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in Language 23(2). 271–306.
Janzen, Terry. 2004. Space Rotation, Perspective Shift, and Verb Morphology in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 149–174.
Janzen, Terry. 2007. The expression of grammatical categories in signed languages. In Pizzuto, Elena & Paola Pietrandrea & Raffaele Simone (eds.), Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies, 171–197. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Janzen, Terry. 2012a. Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Pfau, Roland & Steinbach, Markus & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook, 816–840. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Janzen, Terry. 2012b. Two ways of conceptualizing space: Motivating the use of static and rotated vantage point space in ASL discourse. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, 156–174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Janzen, Terry. 2017. Composite Utterances in a Signed Language: Topic Constructions and Perspective-taking in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 28(3). 511–538.
Janzen, Terry. 2018. KNOW and UNDERSTAND in ASL: A Usage-based study of grammaticalized topic constructions. In Smith, K. Aaron & Dawn Nordquist (eds.), Functionalist and Usage-based Approaches to the Study of Language: In Honor of Joan L. Bybee, 59–87. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Janzen, Terry. 2025. Looking at perspective-taking through a cognitive linguistics lens. WIREs Cognitive Science 16(2): e70001. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.70001
Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer. 2008. Intersubjectivity in interpreted interactions. In Zlatev, Jordan & Racine, Timothy & Chris Sinha & Esa Iktonen (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, 333–355. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Janzen, Terry & Shaffer, Barbara. 2013. The interpreter’s stance in intersubjective discourse. In Meurant, Laurence & Aurélie Sinte & Myriam Vermeerbergen & Mieke Van Herreweghe (eds.), Sign Language Research, Uses and Practices, 63–84. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton/Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. Reference-point constructions. Mouton Classics: From Syntax to Cognition, From Phonology to Text, 413–450. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Li, Charles N. (Ed.), Subject and Topic, 457–490. New York: Academic Press.
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Liddell, Scott K. 1977. An investigation into the syntax of American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Liddell, Scott K. 1980. American Sign Language Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liddell, Scott K. & Metzger, Melanie. 1998. Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30. 657–697.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1991. Universal Grammar and American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Emmorey, Karen & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, Gesture, and Space, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McIntire, Marina L. 1982. Constituent order & location. Sign Language Studies 37. 345–386.
Mithun, Marianne. 1986. The convergence of noun classification systems. In Colette Craig (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization, 379–397. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Naylor, Paz Buenaventura. 1975. Topic, focus, and emphasis in the Tagalog verbal clause. Oceanic Linguistics 14(1). 12–79.
Neidle, Carol & Kegl, Judy & MacLaughlin, Dawn & Bahan, Benjamin & Lee, Robert G. 2000. The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2021. Multifactorial Information Management (MIN): Summing up the emerging alternative to Information Structure. Linguistics Vanguard 7(1): 20200039. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0039
Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Publishing.
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1982. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27. 53–93.
Sandler, Wendy, & Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2006. Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saunders, Daz. 2025. Mouth actions in Quebec Sign Language: Compositional units or context-dependant gestures. Presentation at International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC) 17, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 14–18 July 2025.
Schembri, Adam. 2003. Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Emmorey, Karen (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shaffer, Barbara. 2004. Information ordering and speaker subjectivity: Modality in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 175–195.
Slobin, Dan I. 2006. Issues of linguistic typology in the study of sign language development of Deaf children. In Schick, Brenda & Marc Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer, (eds.), Advances in the Sign Language Development of Deaf Children, 20–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Craig, Colette (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization, 181–214. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65. 31–55.
Valli, Clayton & Lucas, Ceil. 1992. Linguistics of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Valli, Clayton & Lucas, Ceil & Mulrooney, Kristin J.. 2005. Linguistics of American Sign Language (4th edition). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Vermeerbergen, Myriam & Leeson, Lorraine & Onno Crasborn (eds.). 2007. Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1999. A functional journey with a formal ending: What do brow raises do in American Sign Language? In Darnell, Michael & Moravscik, Edith A. & Noonan, Michael & Frederick Newmeyer & Kathleen Wheatly (eds.), Functionalism and Formalism, Volume II: Case studies, 295–313. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2012. Information structure. In Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.) Sign Language: An International Handbook, 462–489. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Patschke, Cynthia. 1999. Syntactic correlates of brow raise in ASL. Sign Language and Linguistics 2(1). 3–41.
Winston, Elizabeth A. 1995. Spatial mapping in comparative discourse frames. In Emmorey, Karen & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, Gesture, and Space, 87–114. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wilcox, Phyllis Perrin. 2011. GIVE: Acts of giving in American Sign Language. In Newman, John (ed.), The Linguistics of Giving, 175–206. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Zwitserlood, Inge. 2012. Classifiers. In Pfau, Roland & Steinbach, Markus & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook, 158–186. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Terry Janzen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
