Affirmative markers: A cross-linguistic study of overspecification

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2785-0943/21991

Keywords:

morphology, morphosyntax, rarum, polarity, affixation, negation

Abstract

Based on a worldwide sample of 604 languages from 179 families, this study shows that affirmative markers, the functional opposite of standard negators, are highly infrequent and possibly ‘rara.’ This confirms previous impressionistic claims. Nine languages with one affirmative marker each were found. Their geographical distribution (a major cluster in eastern Africa), exponence (five of the nine markers are prefixes), and possible diachronic emergence are discussed. The existence of affirmative markers is explained against the background of ‘overspecification,’ operationalized here as the combination of a high degree of verbal synthesis and a low number of zero markers throughout the system. Languages with affirmative markers generally have a large number of morphological categories/slots and also show a tendency to overtly mark other meanings often zero-marked cross-linguistically (e.g., nominative, present tense, third person). The results suggest that some languages prefer explicitness to economy, which informs different aspects of typology.

References

Ahland, Colleen. 2012. A grammar of Northern and Southern Gumuz. Eugene: University of Oregon. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Ahland, Michael. 2012. A grammar of Northern Mao (Màwés Aas’è). Eugene: University of Oregon. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Amha, Azeb. 2001. The Maale language. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Anderson, Cormac, Natalia Kuznetsova & Shelece Easterday. 2025. Rarities in phonetics and phonology: Exploring rarities. In Natalia Kuznetsova, Cormac Anderson & Shelece Easterday (eds.), Rarities in phonetics and phonology: Structural, typological, evolutionary, and social dimensions, 3–28. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Applebaum, Ayla Ayda Bozkurt. 2013. Prosody and grammar in Kabardian. Santa Barbara: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Aronoff, Mark & Nanna Fuhrhop. 2002. Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3). 451–490. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015858920912

Asao, Yoshihiko. 2015. Left-right asymmetries in words: A processing-based account. Buffalo: State University of New York. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Becker, Laura. 2024. Zero marking in inflection: A token-based approach. Journal of Language Modeling 12(2). 349–413.

Belete, Alemgena. 2018. Documentation and grammatical description of Kara. Addis Ababa: University of Addis Ababa. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Berdicevskis, Aleksandrs & Arturs Semenuks. 2020. Different trajectories of morphological overspecification and irregularity under imperfect language learning. In Peter Arkadiev & Francesco Gardani (eds.), The complexities of morphology, 283–305. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Berdicevskis, Aleksandrs & Arturs Semenuks. 2022. Imperfect language learning reduces morphological overspecification: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE 17(1), e0262876. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262876

Berg, Thomas. 2020. Ordering biases in cross-linguistic perspective: The interaction of serial order and structural level. Linguistic Typology 24(2). 353–397. DOI: 10.1515/Lingty-2019-2031.

Berg, Thomas. 2022. Paradigmatic consequences of the suffixing preference. Studies in Language 46(2). 376–401. DOI: 10.1075/Sl.20019.ber

Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2013. Inflectional synthesis of the verb. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: http://wals.info/chapter/22. (Accessed May 14, 2025.)

Bisang, Walter. 2020. Radical analyticity and radical pro-drop scenarios of diachronic change in east and mainland southeast Asia, west Africa and pidgins and creoles. Asian Languages and Linguistics 1(1). 34–70. DOI: 10.1075/Alal.00002

Bisnath, Felicia, Hannah Lutzenberger, Marah Jaraisy, Rehana Omardeen & Adam Schembri. 2026. Deconstructing notions of morphological ‘complexity’: Lessons from creole and sign languages. Journal of Linguistics 62(1), 177–207. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226725000180

Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001

Börstell, Carl. 2021. GlottoshinyR. Available at: https://linguistr.shinyapps.io/glottoshinyr/. (Accessed May 14, 2025.)

Bybee, Joan. 2002. Main clauses are innovative, subordinate clauses are conservative. In Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 1–17. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bybee, Joan. 2006. Language change and universals. In Ricardo Mairal & Juana Gil (eds.), Linguistic universals, 179–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/Cbo9780511750526

Bybee, Joan. 2011. Markedness: Iconicity, economy, and frequency. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 131–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bybee, Joan. 2015. Language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/Cbo9781139096768

Bybee, Joan, William Pagliuca & Revere Perkins. 1990. On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. In William Croft, Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony: Papers Presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th Birthday, 1–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Colarusso, John. 1992. A grammar of the Kabardian language. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

Comrie, Bernard, Martin Haspelmath & Balthasar Bickel. 2015. The Leipzig glossing rules. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php. (Accessed September 18, 2025)

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2014. Competing motivation models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations? In Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage, 282–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/Cbo9780511840579

Cysouw, Michael & Jan Wohlgemuth. 2010. The other end of universals: Theory and typology of rara. In Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory, 1–10. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17(1/2), 79–106.

Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/Slcs.71

Daniel, Michael & Yury Lander. 2011. The Caucasian languages. In Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, 125–157. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

DeGraff, Michael. 2003. Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79(2). 391–410. DOI: 10.1353/Lan.2003.0114

Diessel, Holger. 2019. The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108671040

Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dryer, Matthew. 2005. Negative morphemes. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 454–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dryer, Matthew. 2013. Order of negative morpheme and verb. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: https://wals.info/feature/143. (Accessed May 14, 2025.)

Dryer, Matthew & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: http://wals.info (Accessed September 14, 2025.)

Enrique-Arias, Andrés. 2002. Accounting for the position of verbal agreement morphology with psycholinguistic and diachronic explanatory factors. Studies in Language 26(1). 1–31.

Etxepare, Ricardo. 2003. Negation. In José Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz De Orbina (eds.), A grammar of Basque, 516–564. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud. 1991. Frequenz und Kognition – Frequenz und Markiertheit. Folia Linguistica 25(3–4). 361–394.

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Eric Johnston & Adrian Edwards. 2005. A grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110893908

Gelderen, Elly van. 2008. Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology 12(2). 195–243. DOI: 10.1515/Lity.2008.037

Givón, Talmy. 1991. Markedness in grammar: Distributional, communicative and cognitive correlates of syntactic structure. Studies in Language 15(2). 335–370. DOI: 10.1075/sl.15.2.05giv

Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/Z.Syn1

Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 2nd edn., 73–113. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Greenberg, Joseph. 2005 [1966]. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Griscom, Richard. 2019. Topics in Asimjeeg Datooga verbal morphosyntax. Eugene: University of Oregon. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis. 2018. Swimming against the typological tide or paddling along with language change? Dispreferred structures and diachronic biases in affix ordering. Journal of Historical Linguistics 8(3). 388–443. DOI: 10.1075/Jhl.17027.Gro

Grossman, Eitan, Anton Antonov & Guillaume Jacques. 2018. A cross-linguistic rarity in synchrony and diachrony: Adverbial subordinator prefixes exist. STUF 71(4). 513–538.

Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2026. Glottolog 5.3. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: http://glottolog.org (Accessed June 22, 2026.)

Handschuh, Corinna. 2014. A typology of marked-S languages. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI: 10.17169/Fudocs_Document_000000019858

Harris, Alice. 2008. On the explanation of typologically unusual structures. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 54–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harris, Alice. 2010. Explaining typologically unusual structures: The role of probability. In Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory, 91–103. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 25–70. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226705003683

Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. The last word on polysynthesis: A review article. Linguistic Typology 22(2). 307–326. DOI: 10.1515/Lingty-2018-0011

Haspelmath, Martin. 2021. Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics 57(3). 605–633. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226720000535

Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2014. Asymmetries in the prosodic phrasing of function words: Another look at the suffixing preference. Language 90(4). 927–960. DOI: 10.1353/Lan.2014.0105

Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.

Jagersma, Abraham. 2010. A descriptive grammar of Sumerian. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Janhunen, Juha. 2012. Mongolian. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/Loall.19

Jing, Yingqi & Paul Widmer & Balthasar Bickel. 2023. Word order evolves at similar rates in main and subordinate clauses: Corpus-based evidence from Indo-European. Diachronica 40(4). 532–556. DOI: 10.1075/Dia.20035.Jin

Kimball, Geoffrey. 1985. A descriptive grammar of Koasati. New Orleans: Tulane University. (Doctoral dissertation.)

König, Christa. 2006. Marked nominative in Africa. Studies in Language 30(4). 655–732. DOI: 10.1075/Sl.30.4.02kon

Kratochvil, František. 2007. A grammar of Abui, a Papuan language of Alor. Utrecht: LOT.

Kumakhov, Muchadin. 1989. Sravnitel’no-Istoricheskaja Grammatika Adygskix (Cherkesskix) Jazykov. [Comparative-historical grammar of the Adyghe (Cherkess) languages]. Moscow: Nauka.

Kumakhov, Muchadin. 2006. Kabardino-Cherkesskiij Jazyk: V Dvukh Tomakh. Tom I. [Kabardian-Cherkess language in two volumes. Volume 1: Writing system, phonetics and phonology, morphology, syntax]. Moscow: Nalchik.

Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lacroix, René. 2009. Description du dialecte Laze d’Arhavi (caucasique du sud, Turquie): Grammaire et textes. [Description of the Laz dialect of Arhavi (South Caucasian, Turkey): Grammar and texts.] Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Lacroix, René. 2019. Laz. In Geoffrey Haig & Geoffrey Khan (eds.), The languages and linguistics of western Asia: An areal perspective, 830–860. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Lehmann, Christian. 2004. Interlinear morphemic glossing. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan, Stavros Skopeteas & Wolfgang Kesselheim (eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, Vol. 2, 1834–1857. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI: 10.5281/Zenodo.7520796

Linn, Mary. 2001. A grammar of Euchee (Yuchi). Lawrence: University Of Kansas. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Malchukov, Andrej. 2011. Interaction of verbal categories: Resolution of infelicitous grammeme combinations. Linguistics 49(1). 229–282. DOI: 10.1515/Ling.2011.006

Maslova, Elena. 2003. A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197174

Mayerthaler, Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit [Morphological Naturalness]. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.

Mayerthaler, Willi. 1987. System-independent morphological naturalness. In Wolfgang Dressler (ed.), Leitmotifs in natural morphology, 25–58. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

McWhorter, John. 2005. Defining creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McWhorter, John. 2007. Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard negation. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Miestamo, Matti. 2007. Symmetric and asymmetric encoding of functional domains, with remarks on typological markedness. In Matti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New challenges in typology: Broadening the horizons and redefining the foundations, 293–314. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Miestamo, Matti. 2010. Negatives without negators. In Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory, 169–194. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Mihas, Elena & Gregorio Santos Pérez. 2015. A grammar of Alto Perené (Arawak). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110766301

Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Why prefixes? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50(1/2). 155–185.

Ngo, Binh. 2021. Vietnamese: An essential grammar. Routledge: London.

Nguyên, Đình Hòa. 1997. Vietnamese. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/Loall.9

Ozerov, Pavel. 2018. Tone assignment and grammatical tone in Anal (Tibeto-Burman). Studies in Language 42(3). 708–733.

Ozerov, Pavel. 2019. Person indexation in Anal. Himalayan Linguistics 18(1). 26–53.

Pilot-Raichoor, Christiane. 2010. The Dravidian zero negative: Conceptualisation and diachronic context of its morphogenesis. In Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds.), Rara and rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity, 267–304. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Shcherbakova, Olena, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Hannah Haynie, Sam Passmore, Volker Gast, Russell Gray, Simon Greenhill, Damián Blasi & Hedvig Skirgård. 2023. Societies of strangers do not speak less complex languages. Science Advances 9. DOI: 10.1126/Sciadv.Adf7704

Skirgård, Hedvig, Hannah Haynie, Damián Blasi, Harald Hammarström, Jeremy Collins, Jay J. Latarche, Jakob Lesage, Tobias Weber, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Sam Passmore, Angela Chira, Luke Maurits, Russell Dinnage, Michael Dunn, Ger Reesink, Ruth Singer, Claire Bowern, Patience Epps, Jane Hill, Outi Vesakoski, Martine Robbeets, Noor Karolin Abbas, Daniel Auer, Nancy Bakker, Giulia Barbos, Robert Borges, Swintha Danielsen, Luise Dorenbusch, Ella Dorn, John Elliott, Giada Falcone, Jana Fischer, Yustinus Ghanggo Ate, Hannah Gibson, Hans-Philipp Göbel, Jemima Goodall, Victoria Gruner, Andrew Harvey, Rebekah Hayes, Leonard Heer, Roberto Herrera Miranda, Nataliia Hübler, Biu Huntington-Rainey, Jessica Ivani, Marilen Johns, Erika Just, Eri Kashima, Carolina Kipf, Janina V. Klingenberg, Nikita König, Aikaterina Koti, Richard Kowalik, Olga Krasnoukhova, Nora Lindvall, Mandy Lorenzen, Hannah Lutzenberger, Tônia Martins, Celia Mata German, Suzanne Van Der Meer, Jaime Montoya Samamé, Michael Müller, Saliha Muradoglu, Kelsey Neely, Johanna Nickel, Miina Norvik, Cheryl Akinyi Oluoch, Jesse Peacock, India Pearey, Naomi Peck, Stephanie Petit, Sören Pieper, Mariana Poblete, Daniel Prestipino, Linda Raabe, Amna Raja, Janis Reimringer, Sydney Rey, Julia Rizaew, Eloisa Ruppert, Kim Salmon, Jill Sammet, Rhiannon Schembri, Lars Schlabbach, Frederick Schmidt, Amalia Skilton, Wikaliler Daniel Smith, Hilário De Sousa, Kristin Sverredal, Daniel Valle, Javier Vera, Judith Voß, Tim Witte, Henry Wu, Stephanie Yam, Jingting Ye 葉婧婷, Maisie Yong, Tessa Yuditha, Roberto Zariquiey, Robert Forkel, Nicholas Evans, Stephen Levinson, Martin Haspelmath, Simon Greenhill, Quentin Atkinson & Russell Gray. 2023. Grambank reveals global patterns in the structural diversity of the world’s languages. Science Advances 9. DOI: 10.1126/Sciadv.Adg6

Spencer, Andrew & Ana Luís. 2012. Clitics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/Cbo9781139033763

Thompson, Lawrence. 1987. A Vietnamese reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Vázquez Álvarez, Juan Jesús. 2011. A grammar of Chol, a Mayan language. Austin: University of Texas. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Velupillai, Viveka. 2012. An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Weir, Helen. 1986. Diachronic development of certain verb prefixes in an OSV language (Nadëb). Lingua 68(4). 291–316.

Willett, Thomas. 1991. A reference grammar of Southeastern Tepehuan. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Wurzel, Wolfgang. 1987. System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. In Wolfgang Dressler (ed.), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology, 59–96. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Wurzel, Wolfgang. 2001. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit: Ein Beitrag zur morphologischen Theoriebildung. [Inflectional morphology and naturalness: A contribution to the formation of morphological theory]. 2nd edn. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI: 10.1515/9783050080130

Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2007. Negation in natural language: On the form and meaning of negative elements. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5). 498–518. DOI: 10.1111/J.1749-818x.2007.00027.X

Zingler, Tim. 2022. Clitics, anti-clitics, and weak words: Towards a typology of prosodic and syntagmatic dependence. Language and Linguistics Compass, e12453. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12453

Zipf, George. 1965 [1935]. The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Zwicky, Arnold & Geoffrey Pullum. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language 59(3). 502–513. DOI: 10.2307/413900

Downloads

Published

2026-07-23

How to Cite

1.
Zingler T. Affirmative markers: A cross-linguistic study of overspecification. LTC [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 1 [cited 2026 Jul. 23];6(1):1–54. Available from: https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/view/21991

Issue

Section

Research articles